Skip to main content

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Code Smell 174 - Class Name in Attributes

Redundancy in names is a bad smell. Names should be contextual

Updated
1 min read
Code Smell 174 - Class Name in Attributes

TL;DR: Don't prefix your attributes with your class name

Problems

  • Not Contextual Names

Solutions

  1. Remove the class prefix from the attribute

Context

This is a naming smell, we should not read attributes in isolation and names are contextual.

Sample Code

Wrong

public class Employee {
   String empName = "John";
   int empId = 5;
   int empAge = 32;
}

Right

public class Employee {
   String name;
   int id; // Ids are another smell
   int age; // Storing the age is yet another smell
}

Detection

[X] Semi-Automatic

When the full name is included in the prefix, our linters can warn us.

Tags

  • Naming

Conclusion

Careful naming is a very important task.

We need to name after the behavior, not type or data

Relations

More Info

Disclaimer

Code Smells are just my opinion.

Credits

Photo by Phoenix Han on Unsplash


Copying skips understanding. Understanding is how you grow. You have to understand why something works or why something is how it is. When you copy it, you miss that. You just repurpose the last layer instead of understanding all the layers underneath.

Jason Fried


This article is part of the CodeSmell Series.

Code Smells

Part 1 of 50

In this series, we will see several symptoms and situations that make us doubt the quality of our developments. We will present possible solutions. Most are just clues. They are no hard rules.