Skip to main content

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Code Smell 18 - Static Functions

Published
2 min read
Code Smell 18 - Static Functions

Yet another global access coupled with laziness.

TL;DR: Don't use static functions. They are global and utilities. Talk to objects instead.

Problems

  • Coupling

  • Testability

  • Protocol Overloading

  • Cohesion

Solutions

Examples

  • Static class methods

  • Static attributes

Sample Code

Wrong

class DateStringHelper {
   static format(date) {
     return date.toString('yyyy-MM-dd'); ;    
  }
}


DateStringHelper.format(new Date());
class DateToStringFormatter {
   constructor(date){
      this.date = date;
   }

   englishFormat() {
     return this.date.toString('yyyy-MM-dd');    
  } 
}

new DateToStringFormatter(new Date()).englishFormat()

Detection

We can enforce a policy to avoid static methods (all class methods but constructors).

Tags

  • Global

  • Libraries

Conclusion

Class are globals disguised. Polluting their protocol with "library methods" breaks cohesion and generates coupling. We should extract static with refactorings.

In most languages, we cannot manipulate classes and use them polymorphically, so we can't mock them or plug them on tests.

Therefore, we have a global reference too difficult to decouple.

Relations

More info

Credits

Photo by Alex Azabache on Unsplash


There is no programming problem that can't be solved with one more level of indirection.

John McCarthy


This article is part of the CodeSmell Series.

Last update: 2021/06/28

Code Smells

Part 1 of 50

In this series, we will see several symptoms and situations that make us doubt the quality of our developments. We will present possible solutions. Most are just clues. They are no hard rules.